Thesis Research
|
|
The research involves a literature analysis of "Building Architecture" and case studies of projects involving "Software Architecture". It makes use of story telling and a patterns language to convey the assumption that there is a link between Building Architecture and Software Architecture and other architecture intensive disciplines. The link involves architectural theory, design and construction. The patterns are drawn to illustrate some of these links. Observations are presented as context of how the pattern applied to the respective case studies.
|
The Drivers
|
|
The concept that building architecture can be used as a reference for architecture intensive disciplines comes from a number of driving forces.
|
|
The Bauhaus Movement
|
|
Prior to entering the information technology sector, I had studied fine arts and graphics to pursue a career in commercial art and design. At the time I took an interest in the Bauhaus school of art of the early 1900s because of its influence on modern design and its approach to combining "art and science".
Upon getting involved in computer graphics and then programming, there was an immediate attraction towards object orientation, visual modeling and software architecture. Modeling notations can be linked to the style of modernist thinking and abstraction. Hence, the profession of software architecture was appealing because of its link with art and architecture.
Today, many people associate software architecture with the Unified Modeling Language.
Not all information technology professionals see a link between building architecture and software development - let alone the link with modernist thinking. It seems a widely held view or perception that computing is all together new and has little to do with the past. It has become almost unfashionable in the industry to associate it with anything other than the future.
|
|
Contracting as a Software Architect
|
|
For commercial reasons it was easier to contract on the Microsoft platform. However, much of object orientated methodologies and established software engineering principles were lacking in projects using Rapid Application Development (RAD). Each project experience entrenched the idea that architectural thinking was relevant. Despite what was happening with RAD, there were architects at Microsoft such as David Vaskevitch who provided inspiration to think beyond the tools.
Over the years I have specifically focused on software architecture and software engineering of repository based systems, Computer Aided Software Engineering (CASE) tools, client server and web based application frameworks and libraries.
|
|
The Worldwide Institute of Software Architects
|
|
I joined the World Wide Institute of Software Architects because Marc Sewell's idea of Software Architecture as an extension of (building) architecture, struck a cord. In particular the idea of gaining industry recognition and establishing academic direction and support was appealing.
|
|
The Software Crisis and Postmodernism
|
|
The paper by Hall et al. on "Postmodern Software Development" postulated on the link between software engineering and modernism and that the software crisis is an extension of the social cultural phenomenon of postmodernism.
|
|
Black Economic Empowerment in IT
|
|
Architecture is a knowledge issue and there is a real need to address empowerment in the country through a shift in thinking. There exists an opportunity to identify architecture intensive disciplines as vehicles for mentorship and the creation of knowledge workers.
|
|
Extreme Programming and Christopher Alexander
|
|
Friends have introduced other sources of architectural knowledge. Hence, Kent Beck's work on Extreme Programming and the many references to Christopher Alexander also contributed to the body of research material.
|
|
Story Telling and Software Patterns
|
|
Finally, the art of story telling and software patterns as architectural tools resulted in the compilation of the story and the patterns derived from them. This is the approach taken in this research. As such you are encouraged to read a story with little reference to information technology in order to gain a broader perspective of architecture. There are 50 patterns derived from the story which were placed in the context of two past projects as case studies of software architecture and other architecture intensive disciplines.
|
|
Egyptian Architecture
|
One of the most important (if not challenging) aspect of architecture is the relationship between Patron-Architect-Builder. This is an over simplification of roles which will continue to raise architectural debates. Complexity is introduced when a role represents more than one individual view. The patron as the sponsor can lead to conflicts with the patron as the user. The role of the architect has been re-defined many times over and is still undergoing change.
|
The fundamental triangle of patron-architect-builder remained a constant and important feature of architectural history. The importance of the patron, customer or client cannot be under-estimated. Much architecture would have remained in the realm of theory and would never have been constructed without the noble patrons. It was often customary for patrons to take credit for the work rather than the architect.
|
The first recorded instance of the patron and architect relationship was in Egyptian architecture. The Pharaonic system was established around 3200 B.C. when Menes united the lower and upper kingdoms of Egypt into one kingdom. The successive dynasties that followed is known as the Old Kingdom, the first of three great Egyptian periods. Around 2800 B.C. the first known large stone construction was built in the third dynasty. His chief minister Imhotep organized King Djoser’s stepped pyramid at Sakkara. [Risebero, 1997, p.11]
|
Imhotep was the first known architect and is also regarded as the "father of medicine". Historians believed that Imhotep was a legend because of the many achievements that were attributed to him. He held the highest office in Egypt, i.e. administrator, vizier, priest, healer, and interpreter of dreams, scribe and teacher. [Matthews, 2002]
|
Archeologist Ron Wyatt provides information on Imhotep and writes that
"Manetho wrote that 'during his [Djoser of the 3rd Dynasty] reign lived Imouthes [i.e. Imhotep], who because of his medical skill has the reputation of Asclepius [the Greek god of medicine] among the Egyptians and who was the inventor of the art of building with hewn stone.' It was this statement that caused the specialists to doubt the existence of a real man named Imhotep. But in 1926, the question was settled once and for all- Imhotep was a real man. When excavations were carried out at the Step Pyramid at Sakkara, fragments of a statue of pharaoh Djoser were found. The base was inscribed with the names of Djoser and of 'Imhotep, Chancellor of the King of Lower Egypt, Chief under the King, Administrator of the Great Palace, Hereditary Lord, High Priest of Heliopolis, Imhotep the Builder, the Sculptor, the Maker of Stone Vases...'”
[Wyatt, 2002]
|
Some believe Imhotep to be the biblical character Joseph. Reference is also made to him in many of the early writings. His influence in Egypt can be seen from the fact that he was later deified as the god Nefertum, son of Ptah. Ptah was the creator god - unifier of all other gods and god of the masons. His wife Sekhmet was the lioness god. The famous pyramids of Memphis were built for the three gods, Ptah (Father), Sekhmet (Wife) and Nefertum (Son). This bears testament to the high regard Egypt held for the achievements of Imhotep, who was not of royal birth.
|
There is marked improvement in Egyptian architecture after the third dynasty of the Old Kingdom. A number of attributes of Egyptian architecture are of interest; i.e. the role of beliefs and religion. The role of belief systems and culture in architectural theory is evident in Egypt. Unlike the early step pyramid of Sakkara, extensive use of hieroglyphics is made, especially in religious form. The visual language developed is sophisticated and complex. It was not a primitive form of communication as many assume it to be simply because it was of an earlier period.
|
Egyptian architecture also illustrates how construction plays a significant role and often helps to re-define the theory and design. The materials used provided a major advance in architecture with the use of lime stones. The movement of these large units of construction required advanced engineering. The methods of prefabrication of large “stone” components, transportation and leveraging are remarkable. They required an understanding of astronomy, physical laws and mathematics. In fact, the most remarkable aspect of Egyptian architecture is its precision in construction. The base of the pyramid is absolutely level and each side is perfectly positioned to face north, south, east and west. The positions of the pyramids in relation to each other are precisely aligned.
|
It is estimated that about 100 000 men participated in the construction at Memphis, grouped by the hundreds. The epic proportions of such a construction are a feat of organization. Although undoubtedly authoritarian, there were many skilled craftsmen. Considering that the laborers consisted of agricultural workers diverted from their traditional work, the production of food must have required careful administration and management. [Risebero, 1997]
|
The Egyptians mastered the use of stone, but the Greeks advanced in their use of metals and tools. Despite the ascent of the military world powers of Babylon, Assyria and Persia, the Greeks would gain both military victories and cultural influence and inherit many of the architectural advances made by the Egyptians.
|
|
Greek and Roman Architecture
|
Just as the triangular form of Egyptian pyramids represents a visual model of that period, triangles can also be used to represent some of the theories of Classical architecture. The treatise "On Architecture" written in retirement by the Roman military engineer and architect Vitruvius Pollio during the period of 31 B.C. to 14 A.D. [Raeburn, 1980, p. 60] expressed ideas, which form the basis for many architectural theorizing and controversy. He recognized that there are three different requirements for a building:
|
|
Firmitas: it should be structurally sound : Structure
Utilitas: it must have a practical function : Function
Venustas: it should be beautiful : Aesthetics
|
According to Raeburn,
"Vitruvius' book was written principally about Greek architecture. The most important themes that derive from his book are the definitions of the classical Orders, theories of proportion based on modular system, on simple geometry and on the human body, and aesthetic definitions relating to harmony and proportions such as 'disposition', 'distribution', 'symmetry' and 'eurhythmy'. Over fifty manuscript copies of the book have survived from the Middle Ages, and it seems that it was used as a textbook by medieval architects, largely for the geometric ideas it contains."
[Raeburn, 1980, p. 9-12]
|
Today the triad relationship of Structure-Function-Aesthetics is a fundamental part of architecture. Architects throughout the classical, modernist and postmodernist periods referenced Vitruvius’ ideas. Today the minimum five years formal education are close to the definitions set by Vitruvius for what constituted an architect. He stated that architects should have amongst others, the following attributes:
|
|
Should have an imagination
An understanding of the theoretical and practical aspects of Construction
Should be versed in:
Letters
Drawings
Geometrical Instruments
Optics
Arithmetic
History
Philosophy
Music
Medicine
Law
Astronomy
|
The emphasis on theory ensured that the architectural profession throughout the ages endured - surviving even the buildings and physical structures of their construction. Through recorded trial and error and the ideals of what should be, a body of knowledge has been placed before us, which can benefit many contemporary architecture-intensive disciplines.
|
The role of the architect was more prominent in Greek architecture than in Roman. Greek architects were considered artists - balancing community, religion and civic institutions - whereas Roman architects were technicians and engineers. [Foster, 1983, p.18]. The progress of Greek architecture was described as
"an empirical search for form. The development of Greek temple architecture had little to do with either structure or function. Nor was it much concerned with internal space; since the main rituals took place outside, the exterior form dominated architects' thinking."
[Foster, 1983, p.43]. This may seem to have been a contradiction of Vitruvius, but the answer lies in the Greek interpretation of structure and function and in their understanding of mathematical and geometric laws. While the Greeks pursued the triad of structure-function-aesthetics, their mental models of geometry and mathematics limited them.
|
In 1945 William Mills Irvin Jr., a retired curator of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, wrote his controversial study on "Art and Geometry". It was controversial because it argued against the supremacy of the Greek culture, which was regarded as the foundation of Western civilization. He concluded that Greeks were "tactile-thinkers" as opposed to "visual-thinkers". Their perceptions of space were based not on a three-dimensional view but on their sense of touch. Today, it is recognize that of the three learning methods (auditory, visual and kinaesthetic or tactile), tactile learning is the most challenging for modern educators. Unfortunately, there is an unjustified perception or social stigma that tactile learning is associated with slow learners.
|
Irvin was not attacking the Greeks, he was merely placing the evidence of his study,
"Basically, the Greeks thought about their geometry in terms of an unexpressed chalk line or yard stick which they held in their two hands."
Irvin demonstrated how Euclid derived his basic theorem of parallel lines and concluded that
"Euclid's geometry was based on the tactile-muscular intuitions"
and that neither Euclid nor his successors made any use of proof of abstract ideas such as "infinity", because it was beyond their notions of handling and measurement [Irvin, 1946, p.40-42].
|
Many architectural historians noted, but without the same theoretical examination as Irvin, who wrote,
"The simple fact of the matter is that the figures of Greek sculpture are abstract, ideological conformations, devoid of physical, mental or spiritual histories. Such little emotion or movement as they have has no relation to emotional or volitional states."
[Irvin, 1946, p.23]
|
Theory in the triad relationship between theory-design-construction is more than just about a treatise, it is about a way of thinking - much of which is in the form of tacit knowledge. The evidence that theory is manifested through design into construction is evident throughout architectural history, of which Greek architecture was no exception. Almost all of Greek architecture is based on the post-lintel system or horizontal beams carried by vertical supports. This was a structural model applied irrespective of construction material - wood or stone. The Greeks showed no evidence of improvement in technical design although they were competent technically. They had an understanding of a beam's strength relative to height and thickness, which seems to confirm a tactile approach, but they showed no evidence of a theoretical understanding of structure [Raeburn, 1980, p.47-48].
|
In 1452 the Italian, Leon Battista Alberti, produced the treatise
De Re Aedificatoria
with the object of presenting the works of Vitruvius to his contemporaries. Earlier in 1435 he produced
De Pictura
, which emphasized painting as the basis for architecture. However, it was his treatise, which was the most influential in architectural history. It
"imbued a strong sense of social function of architecture in creating a happy and well-ordered state"
[Raeburn, 1980, p.132]. The most important aspect of Alberti's book which was a turning point from Greek architecture and which inspired an age of enlightenment or the Italian Renaissance, was
"the geometrical scheme for depicting objects in a unified space, or in other words what we today call perspective."
[Irvin, 1946, p.68]
|
Perspective and three-dimensional geometry re-defined the focus of architecture. Architecture began to deal with the internal living space and addressed the problems of space as a whole. It was a dramatic shift from the external view of Greek architecture. The shape of the square and rectangle as a fundamental structure of the grid would become a foundation for many visual concepts in modernism.
|
Interestingly, the shapes of triangles, circles and squares (and rectangles) seemed to gain increasing significance. In religious abstract conception, the circle was considered a perfect symbol. It embodied the concept of the church as representative of the cosmos. In
De Re Aedificatoria
, Alberti identified nine ideal plan-forms based on a circle, and eight polygons derived from the circle. It reinforced the ideal of church construction with a dome as a central location for the altar and sacrament [Risebero, 1997, p.127]. The Church would play a dominant role in architecture throughout the Italian Renaissance, the Middle Ages and the Reformation.
|
|
Architecture and Religion
|
The church was both a building and an institution. The building was a manifestation of the supreme powers that Christendom established in Rome. During the early Middle Ages, the powers of the church superceded those of the state due to its “divine succession”. The building of churches in villages and towns were of great importance in establishing law and order. Christendom included the Orthodox religion centralized in Byzantine and the Church of England. Many forms of architecture stemmed from this period emphasizing religious decoration and ornamentation as well as advances in building construction.
|
Gothic architecture is often regarded as the product of a highly religious society under the control of the church. However, many of the buildings from the 13th century onwards were increasingly being funded by a secular society of merchants and craftsmen whose knowledge and education were outside the spheres of Christendom. Colonial expansion brought about great wealth outside of the domain of the church and created a movement of change towards capitalism. Later, the industrial revolution would change the nature of the patron-architect-builder relationship in that capitalists - businessmen and corporations, replaced the churches as patrons. Resistance to change came from the church whose power was based on the social economic structure of feudalism. Villages and towns where structured on the hierarchy of a ruling nobility, landlords and peasants. The increasing urbanization helped to fuel this change towards a growing working class who found themselves more and more in conflict with the church.
|
"Gothic buildings stand at a crucial transition-point in history, between the church-dominated early Middle Ages and the free, secular world of the Renaissance. It is perhaps this very fact which makes them arguably the finest achievements in the history of western architecture; they are the perfect expression of the dialectical tension between two worlds: between religious faith and analytical reason, between the serene, closed monastic society of the old order and the dynamic expansionism of the new."
[Risebero, 1997, p.84]
|
The tension between religious faith and analytical reason would continue through to the modern period. The tension between "religious faith and analytical reason" would be replaced by modern tensions between "art and science" in architecture. This would come about in part because of the premodern preoccupation with decoration and ornamentation. Decoration and ornamentation best illustrates the tensions between two worlds. This was not only the case in Christendom but could also be found in Islamic architecture. In fact, Islamic decoration and ornamentation is also a good example of what Foster notes as an occasion where social values represent the architectural integrity.
|
"An important architectural notion is that it is the nature and working characteristics of the primary materials which determine the appearance and character of a building, and that the structure and construction must reflect these qualities in some way if there is to be architectural integrity. Most architecture can be evaluated in this way because these factors are also representative of the cost or effort of building, which are generally among the more critical determinants. However, occasionally more abstract ones outweigh such practical considerations, sometimes to the extent that buildings become vehicles for the expression of different values. Invariably, architecture reflects the preoccupations of the society."
[Foster, 1983, p.194]
|
Decoration seems to be a key attribute in Islamic architecture. Representation of living beings is forbidden. Abstract patterns and calligraphy provide the basis of a framework for infinite variations. Islamic architects are mathematicians and scientists who place great importance on geometric principles. There are three basic motifs in the framework used in Islamic decoration. The first is writing, the second is vegetal (leaves, flowers and fruit) and the third is geometrical. Geometry is the governing principle of the other elements.
|
In contrast to the non-picturesque approach of Islamic architecture is the decoration and a preoccupation with space evident in Byzantine architecture. To enter the church was to enter a representation of heaven itself. The image of heaven is achieved in the structural design of a dome covering a polygon or square. Inside the dome a mosaic is created with images of heavenly figures dissolved into the curvature of the dome, thus giving the illusion of infinite space. Movement is also expressed through light, which when reflected off the mosaic creates an illusion of movement.
|
The effects of light were achieved through the use of glass. The discovery of this transparent material made from heating of sand, soda and lime is considered to have been as early as 1500 B.C. in the Middle East. The Romans perfected this technique and it became a feature of church buildings. In Byzantine church interiors it was used to purposely create optical illusions.
|
Glass was also a feature of Victorian architecture. Windows were at one point considered a luxury for the rich. However, with the industrial revolution and industrial production came an increase in wealth, prosperity and population. The price of glass lowered with the increased demand for factories and office buildings. The glass roof became a hallmark of the Victorian era proliferating in many public places such railway stations, gardens, courtyards, museums and exhibition halls.
|
|
Premodern Architecture
|
The effects of the industrial revolution on architecture should be seen in the context of the debate, that it sparked in all aspects of design. Society became preoccupied with the machine. This was evident not only in architecture, but also in the arts and crafts. During the Victorian era, machines were used to produce cheap imitations of the expensive neoclassical designs. The hatred of machine imitations later became the motivating force for the English Arts and Crafts Movement. [Lucie-Smith, 1983, p.40]
|
The man regarded as the first Industrial Designer was an architect, Christopher Dresser. In 1871, he delivered a paper on
"Ornamentation Considered as High Art"
, which he read to the Royal Society of Arts. Illustrating the demand for industrial design, he states,
"As an architect I have as much work as many of my fellows, as an ornamentalist, I have much the largest practice in the United Kingdom - there is not a branch of manufacture that I do not regularly design patterns for, and I hold regular appointments as 'art adviser' and 'chief designer' to several of our largest art-manufacturing firms."
|
Another influential character of the English Arts and Crafts Movement was John Ruskin. He held a hatred for imitations produced using machines and laid down rules for crafts. These rules influenced art and architecture students such as William Morris, an undergraduate of Oxford, who established the company Morris & Co., later to become a well-known firm in industrial design. Unlike Ruskin, Morris felt that there could be a use for machines in the revival of the arts and crafts. Morris perpetuated the idea that a designer must have a thorough understanding of both processes and design.
|
A follower of William Morris, Walter Crane, divided decoration into two categories namely, organic and inorganic. The former was "an essential and integral part of the structure, to which it gives final expression". The latter he described as mere surface ornament intended to conceal a structure, not emphasize a design. [Foster, 1983, p.196-197]
|
From 1896 to 1903, Hermann Muthesius was the architectural attaché to the German Embassy in London [Lucie-Smith, 1983, p.95]. During this time he became an enthusiast for the English Arts and Crafts Movement. Muthesius was a founder of the German WerkBund, an organization of designers, craftsmen, artists and architects, through which he hoped Germany could benefit from the lessons of the English Arts and Crafts. In 1914, on the eve of the Great War, he proposed his idea of the development of standard forms for manufacture and export. This was opposed, not least by the young architect Walter Gropius, who saw it as a threat to individual expression and enforced the status quo. Muthesius backed down and it was symbolic of the times, for Walter Gropius would become a key figure in the transition towards modernism.
|
Unlike the influential architects and designers of Britain who saw ornamentation and decoration as a way of reviving arts and crafts in the face of machine production, the modernists in Germany sought to integrate the machine into human living and space. In reaction to the decadence of the Art Nouveau style and its German counterpart Jugendstil, Adolf Loos remarked, "ornamentation should be eliminated from all useful objects." [Foster, 1983, p.197]
|
Decoration and ornamentation in the face of machine production was one of the primary design influences of the premodern period leading to modernism. It in turn sparked theories on art and its relevance in a changing world. While these design theories permeated into architectural theory, the driving influence on architecture of the premodern period was the social cultural changes resulting from the industrial revolution. The conditions of the working class had not improved and the problem of housing large working communities was a preoccupation of architects and architecture. In construction, machines were used in advancing production of all materials.
|
|
The Bauhaus School
|
Frank Whitford provides a detailed account of the Bauhaus School and defines three phases in its history from 1919 to 1933.
|
The first phase was from 1919 and 1923.
"The early months of the Bauhaus were marked both by a determination to reform art education and to create a new kind of society, and by a willingness to sacrifice a great deal in order to do so. Plagued like the young Republic itself by internal dissent, unreasonable external demands and crippling economic crises, the Bauhaus was quickly forced to redefine its aims, to temper idealism with realism."
[Whitford, 1984, p.9]
|
The second phase was from 1923 to 1925.
"During the second phase of the school's life, therefore, rational, quasi-scientific ideas gradually replaced Romantic notions of artistic self-expression and brought about important changes in the school's curriculum and teaching methods. This phase embraced the years in which the tottering German economy stabilized and the nation's industry began to flourish. They were, however, also the years in which political extremists of both the left and right gained strength. They, too, directly affected the Bauhaus."
[Whitford, 1984, p.9, 10]
|
The third phase was from 1925 to 1933.
"... when the Bauhaus was forced to leave Weimar: the city's new nationalist government withdrew financial support. The German Republic itself now also suffered increasingly from the attacks of radicals and revolutionaries alike, and the polarization of politics was reflected at the Bauhaus, now located at Dessau. At the same time the national economy enjoyed a brief boom and the Bauhaus began to tailor its teaching to the demands of industry."
[Whitford, 1984, p.10]
|
The closure of the school by the Nazis in 1933 began the spread of Bauhaus ideas across Europe and the United States. The Bauhaus inspired a revolution in design and art education that is still present today. The "foundation course" taught in art schools is a product of the Bauhaus. Wolf von Eckardt stated that the Bauhaus
"created the patterns and set the standards of present-day industrial design; it helped to invent modern architecture; it altered the look of everything from the chair you are sitting in to the page you are reading now."
[Whitford, 1984, p.10]
|
The Bauhaus established the workshop-based training that revolutionized art education and is used to this day. As Gropius explained in an interview,
"I realized that closer links had to be forged between the machine and the artistic individual. So I established workshops, which trained people in two ways - as artists and as craftsmen. It's often wrongly thought that everything was based on handicraft. In fact, it was a place of preparation. You can't understand a machine until you've understood the tools of your craft."
|
Many of the ideas at the Bauhaus were not unique. Since the industrial revolution, educated men and women were contemplating the problems associated with art and its relevance in the new era of the machine. What made the Bauhaus teaching unique, particularly with regards to the foundation course or Vorkurs, was
"the amount and quality of its theoretical teaching, the intellectual rigor with which it examined the essentials of visual experience and artistic creativity."
[Whitford, 1984, p.103]
|
Johannes Itten established the Preliminary or Foundation Course at the Bauhaus. Itten followed a religion based on eastern beliefs called Mazdaznan. Adopting principles from Buddhism, Itten would begin his workshops with breathing exercises. He encouraged his students to study materials and textures by working with materials they could find, feel and touch. In the early stage of the Bauhaus, Itten was the most influential of the teachers since he determined who would take the foundation course and by implication determined who would gain admission into the Bauhaus School.
|
Unlike previous preliminary art education, which taught art history and the problems that were encountered in the past, the preliminary course was about learning abstract forms, color theory, nature of materials and other principles of art and design. The primary focus was on the individual student (senses, emotions and intellect) and assisting them to learn about themselves before deciding on a specific direction. Students were encouraged to go out and get any material they could find and study its nature and produce work from their exploration. It was an economically hard time and students had to go out to dump yards or use whatever was available. Some innovative designs were created.
|
|
"Imagination and creative ability must first of all be liberated and strengthened. Once this has been achieved, technical and practical demands and finally commercial considerations may be introduced. Young people who begin with market research and practical and technical work seldom feel encouraged to search for something really new. If new ideas are to assume artistic form, physical, sensual, spiritual, and intellectual forces and abilities must all be equally available and act in concert. This realization largely determined the subjects and methods of my teaching at the Bauhaus. It was essential to build up the individual student as a well-integrated creative person, a program I consistently advocated in the 'Council of Masters'."
[Itten, 1975, p.8]
|
At the Bauhaus there were two types of teachers or “Masters”. The "Workshop Masters" were skilled craftsmen. They were usually skilled in various disciplines but they taught specific crafts such as painting, pottery, weaving or architecture. There were also the "Masters of Form" who were responsible for aesthetic qualities.
|
The modern painters provided the constructive thinking. They worked with space and form. Gropius explained that he thought the painters could help usher in a new Constructivist thought in architecture. He said,
"We have to pull the whole thing together. We have to destroy the separations between painting and sculpture, architecture and design and so on. It is all one."
Amongst the painters who taught at the Bauhaus were some of the most original and well known including the Swiss artist Paul Klee, and the Russian painter Vasily Kandinsky. Kandinsky virtually invented abstract painting before the Great War. His works had no reference to nature, it was about how he felt. He was developing a visual language based on circles, triangles, squares and lines.
|
Theatre also played a role. The emphasis was not on acting or drama, but on design and construction of props and costumes. In more contemporary business terms, the theatre workshops created a “team spirit” amongst students who worked towards a “shared vision”. No doubt, the emphasis on roles and role-playing also helped in conceptual thinking.
|
Although Graphic Design was not a specific course, photography and typography were taught at the Bauhaus. The face of the modern media was developed at the Bauhaus. The Bauhaus banned the use of serifs. The new typography was bold and clean. The purpose was to provide better clarity in media and print. It helped to make magazine publications accessible to the masses and resulted in the phenomenon of “rapid consumption”. It created the appeal of advertising. With window glass, television and computer screens, the modern typefaces are easier to read.
|
The workshops were designed to enable students to become well rounded in all disciplines. It was an effective teaching method because it catered for kinaesthetic as well as auditory and visual learning. The re-location to the industrial center of Dessau from the cultural hub of Weimar was intended to encourage a closer relationship between art and industrial design. Whereas in the early years at Weimar the emphasis was on individual work, the Bauhaus of Dessau became more focused on industrial design. Works became commercial prototypes for some of the products manufactured in industry. From the Bauhaus came kitchen utensils, furniture, toys and other products that are so common in modern life that many people today would be surprised to discover they originated in the first quarter of the century.
|
In 1923, Laslo Moholy-Nagy took over the foundation course from Itten. He brought a constructivist and functionalist thinking to the course. Josef Albers a graduate of the Bauhaus also taught the course fulfilling one of the Bauhaus aspirations that students should one day become teachers. Albers brought engineering principles to design teaching. He produced three-dimensional structures from paper. Students were taught as engineers rather than as artists. This was also where the use of prototypes and models for expressing design in architecture was instilled.
|
A functional prototype of the modern home was constructed, known as the "Haus am Horn". It had all the features and functions of the modern kitchen. It was unlike the homes of that time. It was not only functional but also based on rational principles. Although it was intended as a commercially viable alternative for housing in Germany, it became an early expression of the modern suburban American homes from the 1950s and 60s.
|
It was the Bauhaus in Dessau, designed by Walter Gropius that was the prototype of the crystalline design of glass and metal which became the fore-runner of the International Style that would be adopted in modern building architecture. Cars and airplanes and other modern machines inspired furniture designs. The steel tubular steel chairs common in modern business interiors were designed at the Bauhaus.
|
There was a housing problem in Dessau especially as it was an industrial area and did not provide adequate housing for workers. With the economic problems facing Germany, there was a need for low-cost housing. Students collaborated on a housing project in a Dessau suburb – assisting in the design and planning. The head of architecture at the Bauhaus was Hannes Meyer who believed that architecture was a science and not an art. He put greater emphasis on the architect's social responsibility.
|
Meyer became the second director of the Bauhaus in 1928 when Gropius resigned because of the personal criticism of the rising Nationalists (Nazi). Meyer was a communist and his appointment played into the hands of the Nazis who had already labeled the Bauhaus as a breeding ground for communism. In 1930, Meyer resigned and the re-knowned architect Mies van der Rohe acquired the directorship. Van der Rohe was appalled by the emphasis on functionalism at the expense of art and wanted to bring back the arts. He also banned political activity which helped in stabilizing the tense relationship with the Nazi dominated Dessau municipal authorities. Despite these changes, in 1932 the Dessau City Council withdrew all staff contracts. Political harassment continued and the Nazis closed down the Bauhaus. A final attempt was made to establish the Bauhaus in a Berlin Factory but in 1993 it too was closed down.
|
|
The Bauhaus Movement
|
With the closing of the Bauhaus School in 1933, the Bauhaus movement began as teachers and students migrated across Europe and North America. Various work and collaborations were undertaken in Europe where the Bauhaus influence was evident. However, it was in the United States that the modernist movement in architecture took its strongest root where American firms and institutions sought many of the Bauhaus masters. Gropius became head of architecture at Harvard. Mies van der Rohe was invited by American architect Philip Johnson and later in 1938 became the Director of the School of Architecture at the Illinois Institute of Technology. [Raeburn, 1980]
|
The path to America was paved through the growing popularity of what was termed the "International Style". The term was derived from a book written by Gropius in 1925 called "International Architecture" [Wolfe, 1982, p.37]. In 1927, the Stuttgart Government put Mies van der Rohe in charge of the worker-housing exhibition. He brought together the top modernist architects - Walter Gropius, Bruno Traut, Max Traut, Peter Behrens, Oud and Mart Sam of the Dutch "De Stijl" and Victor Bourgeois of Belguim. Included in the group was the man later to be considered the greatest and most influential architect of the 20th century, the Frenchman, Charles-Edouard Jeanneret, who abandoned his real name to become known as Le Corbusier [Risebero, 1997, p.245].
|
It was at the Wiessenhof WerkBund project that a common reductionist, cubist style emerged to define the "International Style". Henry-Russell Hitchcock and Philip Johnson for the Museum of Modern Art popularized the term through an article published in the Museum catalogue. It was Johnson's aim to introduce the "International Style" into American architecture.
|
In the United States of America, the Bauhaus principles revolutionized art education, previously dominated by the Beaux-Arts method. Through its influence in education and in practice, the modernist movement flourished. The Bauhaus movement became responsible for the modern face of architecture in many of the American cities such as Chicago and New York. Chicago has been described as "row upon row of Mies van der Rohe buildings".
|
In 1935 Gropius wrote his book entitled, "A New Architecture and the Bauhaus". He declared that a breach had been made with the past, which allows us to envisage a new aspect of architecture corresponding to the technical civilization of the age we live in [Gropius, 1965, p.19]. There were two key elements in his "New Architecture" namely, standardization and rationalization. Standardization did not mean that architecture was in the hands of an elite – something that Gropius did not support in his call in his manifesto for all architects, artists and designers to return to the "crafts". He acknowledged that "personal interest in architecture is something that concerns every one of us in our daily lives" and that this "has been very widely aroused" [Gropius, 1965, p.20].
|
Gropius also reflected that what he viewed as "rationalization" was not meant to place functionalism over aesthetics.
"For instance rationalization, which many people imagine to be its cardinal principle, is really only its purifying agency. The liberation of architecture from a welter of ornament, the emphasis on its structural functions, and the concentration on concise and economical solutions, represent the purely material side of that formalizing process on which the practical value of the New Architecture depends." He continues that the other "the aesthetic satisfaction of the human soul, is just as important as the material. Both find their counterpart in that unity which is life itself. What is far more important than this structural economy and its functional emphasis is the intellectual achievement, which has made possible a new spatial vision"
[Gropius, 1965, p.23-24].
|
One might interpret the following as an elitist statement,
"For whereas building is merely a matter of methods and materials, architecture implies the mastery of space"
[Gropius, 1965]. However, the distinction between architecture, engineering and construction in all forms of human endeavor is not a question of dominance of roles, or that only specific roles "analyze and design", but that these are done at different layers of abstraction, planning and execution. The desire to execute or implement without fully reflecting on design issues is as true now as it was then
"For the last century the transition from manual to machine production has so preoccupied humanity that, instead of pressing forward to tackle the new problems of design postulated by this unprecedented transformation, we have remained content to borrow our style from antiquity and perpetuate historical prototypes in decoration"
[Gropius, 1965, p.24].
|
|
Criticisms of Modernism
|
There are many criticisms of modernist architecture. The emphasis on art has been lost to many modern architects. Modern commercial graphic techniques and visual effects are produced using computer-generated images. The general reliance on technology as opposed to personal mastery is a modern trend. The cubist forms and reductionism of modern architecture is aesthetically boring. "Less is bore" was a reference to the minimalist motto of "less is more". The International Style that gave the impression of a common design - as if one architect produced them - became a representation of a lack of art and creativity.
|
The patron-architect-builder role had changed. Modern architects have been criticized for the religious adherence to the Manifestos and their theoretical pursuits. The result of this was that
"Modern architecture had failed to remain credible partly because it didn't communicate effectively with its ultimate users - the main argument of my book 'The Language of Post-Modern Architecture' - and partly because it didn't make effective links with the city and history."
[Jencks, 1989, p.14]
|
In his book, "From Bauhaus to Our House - a devastating and timely attack on the hideous follies of modern architecture", Tom Wolfe refers to Gropius and other European architects of the International Style as "compound architects". This is in reference to their closed pursuit of the utopian ideals outlined in their manifestos. Wolfe also expresses little regard for the young American architects who he referred to as a "Lost Generation" who held a misguided belief that "they do things better in Europe" [Wolfe, 1993, p.9]. Wolfe was appalled by the lack of relevance placed on the client.
"And if American architects wanted to ride the wave, rather than be wiped out by it, they had first to comprehend on thing: the client no longer counted for anything except the funding"
[Wolfe, 1993, p.40].
|
Not everyone believed in the new methods in art education and the departure from the Beaux Art tradition of teaching.
"Studying architecture was no longer a matter of acquiring a set of technical skills and a knowledge of aesthetic alternatives. Before he knew it, the student found himself drawn into a movement and entrusted with a set of inviolable aesthetic and moral principles. The campus itself became the physical compound, as at the Bauhaus."
[Wolfe, 1993, p.54]
|
Wolfe also makes reference to the emphasis on drawings as designs on paper that are never built. Le Corbusier was known for his style of drawing using watercolors. Modern architectural drawings were not art but more a technical form of graphic art. Much of the original artistry, Wolfe decries has been lost. In May 1980, Michael Graves won the Arnold W. Brunner Memorial Prize for Architecture for a drawing of a building not yet built.
|
Another criticism of modern architecture is its pursuit of honest and clean lines but its failure to apply this principle in the integrity of materials. At times the materials used in the construction of modern architecture emulate one material but are made of another. In the 1930s, Le Corbusier covered block work with Stucco to make it look like concrete. [Foster, 1983, p.208].
|
Perhaps the most notable failing of modernism is in its promise to address the problems of housing workers. In 1955 a vast worker-housing project called Pruitt-Igoe was opened in St. Louis. Le Corbusier and his concept of houses as “machines for living in” inspired the design by Minoru Yamasaki. The buildings were rectangular in form separated by open spaces of lawn. The workers for whom it was built avoided them and referred to them as the "projects". Those who moved in were from the rural surrounds of the southern states. They were not accustomed to the densely populated spaces. When a task team met with the workers for whom the projects were intended in 1971 and asked for their opinion, the crowd chanted repeatedly, "Blow it up! Blow it up!"
|
The demolishing of the Pruitt-Igoe projects was regarded as an event, which heralded the end of modern architecture. Ironically, Yamasaki was also the architect of the twin towers, which were destroyed in the terror attacks of September 11 2001. Yamasaki's modern design was considered by some to be dull. Yet, it was symbolic of the modernity of the Western world, something that undoubtedly motivated the choice of the attacks. Whilst, it may not have been aesthetically appealing, it may have helped to save lives. The lifts were still working after the attack. While the collapse killed the remaining people inside the building, its vertical nature helped to save those in and around the surrounding buildings [Pearman, 2002].
|
Charles Jencks referred to the demolishing of the Pruitt-Igoe projects in his studies of postmodern architecture. He is responsible for determining the period of postmodernism as well defining architecture in three phases: premodern, modern and postmodern.
|
"Post-Modernism, like Modernism, varies for each art both in its motives and time-frame, and here I shall define it just in the field with which I am most involved - architecture. The responsibility for introducing it into the architectural subconscious lies with Joesph Hudnut who, at Harvard with Walter Gropius, may have wished to give this pioneer of the Modern Movement a few sleepless nights. At any rate, he used the term in the title of an article published in 1945 called "the post-modern house" (all lower case, as was Bauhaus practice), but didn't mention it in the body of the text or define it polemically. Except for an occasional slip here and there, Philip Johnson or Nikolaus Pevsner didn’t use it until my own writing on the subject which started in 1975."
[Jencks, 1989]
|
|
Wholes versus Parts
|
In many ancient designs, where patterns pursued natural architecture, there is a distinct lack of symmetry or straight lines. While shapes such as circles, squares, rectangles and triangles are recognizable; they are not drawn with straight lines or in symmetry. They are free flowing as if observed only in the shapes derived from nature. It would seem that the wall murals of the Ndebele people in southern Africa would argue against this notion. Ndebele homes are brightly colored with abstract constructivist patterns.
|
But as Powell notes in his book "Ndebele - A people and their art",
"Ndebele mural art, geometric patterns on traditional houses have their beginnings in the 1940’s. The first 'Ndebele-style' wall paintings that we know of were photographed by Pretoria architect and university academic Al Meiring at a single settlement in the Hartebeestfontein area during the late 1940s - and there is every indication that it was in fact here that the practice of decorative and geometric wall paintings, at least as we think of it today, had its origins among the Ndebele."
[Powell, 1995]
|
This may indicate that natural architecture is in some way less superior to modern architecture in thinking. But this is not so. In the first paragraph of Peter Senge's book, "The Fifth Discipline - the art and practice of the learning organization", the author writes,
|
"From a very early age, we are taught to break apart problems, to fragment the world. This apparently makes complex tasks and subjects more manageable, but we pay a hidden, enormous price. We can no longer see the consequences of our actions; we lose our intrinsic sense of connection to a larger whole. When we then try to 'see the big picture,' we try to reassemble the fragments in our minds, to list and organize all the pieces. But, as physicist David Bohm says, the task is futile - similar to trying to reassemble the fragments of a broken mirror to see a true reflection. Thus, after a while we give up trying to see the whole altogether."
[Senge, 1990, p.3] This aptly describes the modernist thinking of abstracting, structured methods and artefact gathering.
|
The thought is also conveyed by Charles Jencks.
"Modern sciences have triumphed through specializing on limited parts of reality: extremely few of them, like ecology and ethnology, have been holistic. Modern knowledge has progressed by analyzing problems into their parts, dividing to conquer, hence the multiple branching of university departments and investigative disciplines over the last two hundred years. Only a few fields, such as philosophy, ethnology and sociology have made their purview the whole of knowledge, or the interconnection of disciplines, and on these rare occasions only imperfectly so. Perhaps in the future with the environmental crises and the increasing globalization of the economy, communications and virtually every specialization, we will be encouraged - even forced - to emphasize the things which interact, the connections between growing economy, an ideology of constant change and waste. Those who don't realize the world is a whole are doomed to pollute it".
[Jencks, 1989]
|
Senge later uses the story that astronaut Rusty Schweikert recounts of floating above the earth and noticing earth without the geographical boundaries and lines that divide nations, to illustrate the principles of systems thinking. Of this "direct experience" he writes,
"The earth is an indivisible whole, just as each of us is an indivisible whole. Nature (and that includes us) is not made up of parts within wholes. It is made up of wholes within wholes. All boundaries, national boundaries included, are fundamentally arbitrary. We invent them and then, ironically, we find ourselves trapped within them."
[Senge, 1990, p.371]
|
Natural architecture and thinking is as much about seeing wholes as opposed to parts and understanding the interconnectivity of life. It is a liberating view that helps us to express ourselves more closely with nature than the arbitrary and man-made constraints of classical, modernist and postmodernist thought. Natural Architecture is not simply an aspect of the postmodernist movement but, as Senge noted, is associated with the pre-industrial cultures whose beliefs were akin to the theory of "Gaia" - the belief that the biosphere, all life on earth, is itself a living organism.
|
|
Natural Patterns, Spirit and Beliefs
|
Despite the many criticisms of modernism, there are many important facets in thinking to come out of it, which is relevant to our time and circumstance. Perhaps, the secret of applying it in the so-called "Third World" lies in our finding a synergy between some of the positive aspects in the modernist thinking with what can be learned from natural architecture.
|
An interesting approach in this direction is Biomimetics, which is the study of biological structures and function. It is gaining ground in material sciences, particularly in the development of materials or components for construction. Scientist Stephen Wainwright predicts
"Biomimetics will engulf molecular biology and replace it as the most challenging and important biological science of the 21st Century." Professor Mehmet Sarikaya claims: "We are on the brink of a materials revolution that will be on a par with the Iron Age and the Industrial Revolution. We are leaping forward into a new era of materials. Within the next century, I think Biomimetics will significantly alter the way in which we live."
[Sarikaya, 1995]
|
There are many lessons that can be learnt from natural architecture in design and construction. But perhaps its most significant metaphors come from the theories associated with belief systems. Natural architecture is also used to define a recent movement in architecture and design and is also referred to as evolutionary and green architecture. The emphasis is on organic designs that blend into the natural surrounds or incorporates nature in living spaces.
|
Echoing the early view of the natural world, David Pearson writes that the revival of natural architecture "puts us in touch again with the primeval forces of life-sun, wind, earth, water - and celebrates the cycles of seasons". Its aim is to support life and health and to bring regeneration to body and soul [Pearson, 1994, p.12].
|
Amongst the common beliefs of early natural architecture was the belief that there should be spaces provided for the living and the dead. Dwelling places were built in harmony with the perceived surroundings including those of the spiritual world. The Pueblo Indians of New Mexico in the United States believed that the link between earth and spirit was fundamental. They viewed the world as layers of "planes" and believed that their ancestors lived just below the surface of the earth and that they traveled through the second and third planes to reach the fourth where humans existed. They built houses with chambers or “kivas” that have levels or planes. The entrance was a ladder at the top, just above the surface of the earth representing the fourth level where humans lived.
|
The link to the past is also about survival. Many natural architects believe that lessons can and must be derived from the way early civilizations survived by preserving their environment and culture. There is a sense of urgency which comes from the "post-rape of the environment", as the earth is being stripped of its resources, polluted and destroyed. Natural architecture is also seen as a way to preserve cultures. Natural architects argue that our link with the past has been broken and needs to be restored in order to move forward into the future. Communities need a sense of identity.
|
Cultural identity and environmental concerns drive the emphasis that Filipino architect Francisco "Bobby" Mañosa places on designs based on the traditional "Nipa Hut" made of bamboos. Faced with the sense that western values are eroding traditional culture in the Philippines, Mañosa's buildings are based on traditional designs. He also makes use of bamboos, which are plentiful but considered to be technically and socially "poor" in quality.
|
Pearson also highlights the work of Frank Lloyd Wright, who is traditionally associated with the Arts and Crafts Movement of the premodern period. But Wright's buildings stand out because of his use of organic decoration.
|
"With Wright organic design was not just decoration or style, it became the underlying inspiration. He wanted his buildings to be intimate with nature and literally to love the ground on which they stood. He felt the ground to be more important than the building, for the ground would endure the longer, and was very much in sympathy with Thoreau's view that we are, 'but a sojourner in nature'. Because nature is not symmetrical, Wright felt the same should be true of a building if it was to reflect the organic and the living."
[Pearson, 1994, p.50]
|
A contemporary, well-known and influential architect is Christopher Alexander - Theorist, Professor of Architecture at the University of California, Berkeley. He is an author of an influential series of books from Oxford University Press, which explore in practical detail what it is that makes buildings and communities humane over time.
|
"'A design professional of depth - his 1964 Notes on the Synthesis of Form - is still in print - Alexander is inspired by how design occurs in the natural world. "Things that are good have a certain kind of structure,' he told me. 'You can't get that structure except dynamically. Period. In nature you've got continuous very-small-feedback-loop adaptation going on, which is why things get to be harmonious. That's why they have the qualities that we value. If it weren't for the time dimension, it wouldn't happen. Yet here we are playing the major role in creating the world, and we haven't figured this out. That is a very serious matter'".
|
Applying this approach to buildings, Alexander frames the design question so:
"What does it take to build something so that it's really easy to make comfortable little modifications in a way that once you've made them, they feel integral with the nature and structure of what is already there? You want to be able to mess around with it and progressively change it to bring it into an adapted state with yourself, your family, the climate, whatever."
[Brand, 1994, p.21]
|
Christopher Alexander has inspired the Patterns Movement which involves the discovery of design patterns – particularly in the way it relates to human living spaces and nature. He has authored 4 volumes on his theories relating to design. His 4th volume is likely to be the most controversial as it deals with his theory regarding what he refers to as the inner “i”. He believes that there is a “life force” in nature which defines good design. This “life force” is a process that exists in both natural and man-made structures.
|
The work of Christopher Alexander is significant because it raises the level of abstraction to a spiritual level. In a scientific world, it would be acceptable to use the term “Natural Architecture” but it would not be appropriate to use a religious term such as “Creation”. In the emerging architecture-intensive disciplines, there is a need to acknowledge this movement that the human experience is important. It includes belief systems and cultures. We should not perceive belief systems as irrational, dismiss them as superstition or reject them as out-dated rituals. Belief systems not only help architects to create structures that are meaningful to people but enable them to understand the essence and purpose of their work.
|
Ancient practices associated with natural architecture can provide modern architects with powerful tools. Consider the practice of story-telling which is acknowledged by knowledge workers as a technique for discovering tacit knowledge. Just as nature provided patterns for structures, it also provided metaphors for stories. Story-telling combined with visual modelling are powerful tools in discovering and communicating architectural concepts and designs.
|
The purpose of story-telling from one generation to another was not to record facts or statistics. It’s primary purpose in most cultures was to help preserve a way of life. The power of the story was its openness to interpretation. A story was a tool, to be adapted in use for the specific time and generation, to convey the essence that leads to an understanding and design of values, principles and practices. In this context, the story-telling technique has proven to be effective as many cultures and belief systems today owe their preservation to it. In contrast, technological advances have done little to sustain many western cultures and values which are now preserved only through life-less exhibitions in museums and art.
|
As our ancient ancestors discovered, the story of nature provides infinite lessons for mankind. For architects and thinkers who see themselves as learners and teachers, our greatest achievement is in being able to re-tell a story. Not only are we able to demonstrate our understanding but more importantly we can participate in the time-less act of sharing knowledge from generation to generation.
|
An appreciation for natural architecture brings us back to the beginning of our story. The debate between "art" and "science" (and perhaps all other philosophical debates) begins and ends in nature, because in nature these are embodied as one. The terms "art" and "science" are man-made. When seen as a whole, they both represent perspectives or views of the same thing - nature. In natural architecture we find not only design patterns, but that the whole of nature itself exists as the epitomy of structure, function and aesthetics.
|
|
Diagram
|
|
|
Title
|
|
Shearing Layers of Change
|
Building Architecture
|
|
This work by Stewart Brand is an essential source for associating buildings and software development. Brand provides strong evidence that buildings are not just static objects but that they are dynamic.
There is for instance a model based on Frank Duffy's “Shearing Layers of Change” model of the way a building tears itself overtime.
The Layers: Site, Structure, Skin, Services, Space Plan and Stuff is defined as follows:
“Site - This is the geographical setting, the urban location and the legally defined lot, whose boundaries and context outlast generations of ephemeral buildings.
Structure - The foundation and load-bearing elements are perilous and expensive to change, so people don't. These are the building. Structural life ranges from 30 to 300 years (but few buildings make it past 60, for other reasons).
Skin - Exterior surfaces now change every 20 years or so, to keep up with fashion or technology, or for wholesale repair. Recent focus on energy costs has led to re-engineered Skins that they are airtight and better insulated.
Services - These are the working guts of a building: communications wiring, electrical wiring, plumbing, sprinkler system, HVAC (heating, ventilating and air conditioning), and moving parts like elevators and escalators. They wear out or obsolesce every 7 to 15 years. Many buildings are demolished early if their outdated systems are too deeply embedded to replace easily.
Space Plan - The interior layout - where walls, ceilings, floors and doors go. Turbulent commercial space can change every 3 years or so; exceptionally quiet homes might wait 30 years.
Stuff - Chairs, desks, phones, pictures; kitchen appliances, lamps, hairbrushes, all the things that twitch around daily to monthly. Furniture is called mobilia in Italian for good reason.” [Brand, 1994, p.12-13]
|
Architecture Intensive Disciplines
|
|
There is a correlation between Change in Software Development (Think Web Site) and Buildings. This model of “how buildings tear themselves apart over time” can be adopted as a Model (theory) for Change Rate of Software Application Architectures (Buildings).
It can be argued that these can also represent elements in software application architecture, where the change provides the friction that work against each other:
Site = Meta Architecture (including Business, System Infrastructure or Platform)
Structure = Application Architecture
Skin = Presentation Framework or User Interface (GUI) Architecture
Services = Services (Internal re-use programs, APIs, Web Services, Engines, etc)
Space Plan = Application Modules or Decomposition
Stuff = user components or elements (data, controls, etc.)
|
Case Study A: Large Corporate IT
|
|
|
|
Most systems architecture have shearing layers of change. The portal framework architecture was designed for configuring change dynamically. The main pre-requisite was ensuring compliance to design standards. Hence a tool was created for generating structural objects such as database tables and classes. Templates were used for interfaces. Applied correctly, user could request changes and unless they were structural, these could be applied very quickly with minimal risks.
|
Case Study B: Small Commercial Team
|
|
|
|
The shearing layers were applied only after refactoring. The directory structures and middle tier components were re-engineered for better configuration control and implementing changes to logical code. Previously, implementing change and re-compiling was cumbersome. What was still outstanding was the refactoring of the hard coded SQL statements to stored procedures and re-designing the database. Once this was in place we could implement a more maintainable structural and service layer. The skin or interface which had already had minor modification was also to undergo a major re-work. The architectural vision involved at least one year's work to rework the "shearing layers" of the above pattern. Unfortunately, we only completed a quarter of the scope.
|
|
Books
|
|
Alexander C, Ishikawa S & Silverstein M, 1977, A Pattern Language, Oxford University Press, Oxford
|
|
Beck K, 2000, Extreme Programming Explained – Embrace Change, Addison-Wesley, Boston
|
|
Brand S, 1994, How Buildings Learn: What Happens After They’re Built, Orion Books Ltd, London
|
|
Brash E Editor, 1981, the Art of Photography, Time-Life Books, Amsterdam
|
|
Brooks F, 1995, The Mythical Man Month, Addison-Wesley, Boston
|
|
Coplien J, 2000, Software Patterns, SIGS Books & Multimedia, New York
|
|
Coyne R, 1995, Designing Information Technology in the Postmodern Age: From Method to Metaphor, MIT Press, Boston
|
|
De Bono E, 1977, Word Power – An illustrated dictionary of vital words, Penguin Books, Middlesex
|
|
Edwards B, 1986, Drawing from the Artist Within, William Collins, Glasgow
|
|
Foster M (Ed), 1983, The Principles of Architecture, Style, Structure and Design, Phaidon Press Limited, Oxford
|
|
Graham I, 1994, Object Oriented Methods, Addison Wesley, New York
|
|
Gonick L & Wheelis M, 1991, The Cartoon Guide to Genetics, Harper Perennial Library, London
|
|
Gropius W, 1965, The New Architecture and the Bauhaus (English Translation), The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
|
|
Itten J, 1975, Design and Form Revised Edition: The Basic Course at the Bauhaus and Later, John Wiley & Sons, London
|
|
Ivins Jr W, 1946, Art and Geometry – A study in space intuitions, Harvard University Press, New York
|
|
Jacobsen I, Booch G & Rumbaugh J, 1999, The Unified Modeling Language, Addison Wesley Longman, Boston
|
|
Jacobsen I, Booch G & Rumbaugh J, 1999, The Unified Software Development Process, Addison Wesley Longman, Boston
|
|
Jalote P, 2000, CMM in Practice, Addison-Wesley Longman, Boston
|
|
Jencks C, 1989, What is Post-Modernism, St Martin’s Press, New York
|
|
Johnson P, 1983, A History of the Modern World From 1917 to the 1980s, George Wedienfeld & Nicolson Ltd, London
|
|
Livingston A & I, 1992, The Thames and Hudson Encyclopedia of Graphic Design and Designers, Thames and Hudson, London
|
|
Lucie-Smith E, 1983, A History of Industrial Design, Phaidon Press, Oxford
|
|
Lupton E & Miller A, 1993, The ABC’s of Bauhaus, the Bauhaus Design and Theory, Thames and Hudson, London
|
|
Michalko M, 1991, Thinker Toys – a handbook for business creativity in the ‘90s, Ten Speed Press, Berkeley
|
|
Papadakis Dr A (Ed), 1990, Post-Modernism on Trial, St Martin’s Press, New York
|
|
Pearson D, 1995, Earth to Spirit: In Search of Natural Architecture, Gaia Books Limited, London
|
|
Powell I, 1995, Ndebele – A people and their art, Struik Publishers, Cape Town
|
|
Race P, 2001, 2000 Tips for Trainers and Staff Developers, Stylus Publishing, London
|
|
Raeburn M Editor, 1988, Architecture of the Western World, Popular Press, London
|
|
Risebero B, 1997, The Story of Western Architecture, Herbert Press, London
|
|
Roderiques C & Garratt C, 2001, Introducing Modernism, Icon Books, Cambridge
|
|
Sarikaya M, 1995, Biomimetics, Design and Processing Materials, Springer-Verlag, New York
|
|
Senge P, 1990, The Fifth Discipline, Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group, New York
|
|
Stair R, 1996, Principles of Information Systems – A Managerial Approach, International Thomson Publishing, Cambridge
|
|
Vaskevitch D, 1995, Client Server Strategies, Wiley John and Sons Incorporated, Somerset
|
|
Whitford F, 1984, Bauhaus, Thames and Hudson, London
|
|
Whitten J, & Bentley L, 1998, Systems Analysis And Design Methods 4th Edition, Irwin/McGraw-Hill, New York
|
|
Wolfe T, 1993, From Bauhaus to Our House, Pan Books, London
|
Internet
|
|
Henry J, URL: http://www.designcommunity.com/discussion/2849.html, Accessed: 20021023
|
|
Matthews K, URL: http://www.greatbuildings.com/architects/Imhotep.html, Accessed: 20021110
|
|
Pearman H, URL: http://www.hughpearman.com/articles2/wtc2.html, Accessed: 20021024
|
|
Wyatt R, URL: http://www.wyattmuseum.com, Accessed: 20021027
|
Journal
|
|
Hall P, Hovenden F, Rachel J, & Robinson H, 1998, Postmodern Software Development, The Computer Journal, 41, 363-375
|
Video
|
|
Whitford F, 1994, Bauhaus – the face of the 20th century, Phaidon
|
|
|
|
|